top of page

Questions

Public·22 members

Gerry PatonGerry Paton
Gerry Paton

Machine Padding the Chest

If the chest is to be padded flat, and stitch direction doesn't matter, what's the point in doing it by hand?


I appreciate that uniform rows of zig-zag stitching might encourage folds/ripples, but each machined row could be offset to replicate what is being done by hand. And although I imagine that control of tension within the chest might be an issue, surely increasing the length of the zig-zag stitches would resolve this? And/or messing with the tension of the machine?


Obviously the lapel is a different thing, because shaping of the roll has to be done by hand, but how do you justify doing the chest by hand? I've seen at least one demonstration on youtube showing how to pad it using a zig-zag stitch. And even Savile Row wasn't averse to doing this in the 1980s, from what I gather. So is there something I'm missing? Or should I be burnt at the stake for being a heretic??


Incidentally, I doubt my 1960s domestic would be able to fit all that bulk under its foot, let alone feed it through (such is the weakness of the motor), so this is merely a hypothetical question. 🙂

339 Views
Reza
Reza
08 may 2023

Great question!


Here are the differences:


By hand:


  • Low visibility on cloth side due to small bites with a single thread. Great for thin fabrics.

  • Allows for larger stitch lengths which in turn reduces production time.

  • Interconnectedness of surfaces; machine stitches create rows of stitching to cover the surface. The space between these rows is trapped and isolated. This divides the canvas into small rows that are not interconnected anymore. It breaks the spring effect of the canvas and neutralises it.


By machine:


  • Allow for a very firm canvas. Not very desirable. Even for structured garments. The high stitch density of both threads take away the spring of the horsehair.

  • Shows through on thin fabrics

  • Great for fast sampling when a firm canvas is required


I have found that machine padding with a normal machine (not a padding machine) always kills the canvas. It turns it into a stiff piece of cardboard that does not bring out an elegant shape.


Machine padding with a padding machine on the other hand gives identical results to hand padding as it maintains that interconnectedness of the surfaces. The spring of the horsehair is preserved.


There is however, nothing wrong with using a zigzag stitch to pad your canvases if you know why you're doing it for. I have used zigzag stitches on many sample canvases where a firm canvas was necessary.


Collars are sometimes difficult to shape when machine stitched using a standard flatbed machine. A padding machine is best for both if any machine stitching is going to be done.


Standard flatbed machines use a lockstitch with threads visible on both sides of the material. Padding stitch machines use a hem stitch which picks a yarn or two and is only visible on one side. Similar to a hand padding stitch.


Reza

International School of Tailoring.

Members

  • Josh Capdeville
    Josh Capdeville
  • Jonathan  HaswellJonathan Haswell
    Jonathan Haswell
  • Claire HunzekerClaire Hunzeker
    Claire Hunzeker
  • PauII
    PauII
bottom of page